Vitamin B12, Adult, All, All

Vitamin B12 - Health metric data from CDC NHANES 2017-2020

Comprehensive Guide to Vitamin B12, Adult, All, All

Whether you're tracking your health or interpreting clinical measurements, this metric benchmarks provide essential context. For Adult All of All background, having demographic-specific reference data matters significantly for accurate interpretation. The population median of 450 serves as a central reference point, though individual optimal values may vary. Explore the complete distribution, understand what influences these measurements, and discover how to apply this knowledge to your health journey.

What is Vitamin B12?

A measurement of this metric this metric serves as an important indicator within comprehensive health assessment. Expressed in standard units, this measurement enables meaningful comparisons to population benchmarks and personal health tracking over time.

How is Vitamin B12 Measured?

Quality assurance in this metric measurement involves multiple layers of verification and standardization. The NHANES program implements comprehensive quality control including equipment maintenance schedules, technician certification requirements, duplicate measurement protocols, and statistical monitoring of measurement distributions. These measures ensure data integrity across the entire survey period. Whether in clinical settings or research contexts, quality this metric measurement requires: validated equipment, trained personnel, standardized protocols, and ongoing quality monitoring. These elements combine to produce trustworthy health data.

Distribution & Percentiles

The chart below shows how Vitamin B12 is distributed across the population. The percentile values help you understand where you fall relative to others in your demographic group.

Insufficient data for visualization

This metric does not have enough statistical parameters for generating a visualization.

Understanding Percentile Distribution

The distribution of this metric values across the population follows a characteristic pattern that reveals important health insights. The central 90% of values fall between 203.3 (5th percentile) and 696.8 (95th percentile), defining the typical range for healthy individuals. At the center, the median value of 450 indicates that half the population falls above and half below this point. The interquartile range—348.8 to 551.3—encompasses the middle 50% of values, representing the most common range. Understanding where your measurement falls within this distribution provides meaningful context for health assessment.

Percentile Values Breakdown

5th Percentile (P5)

203.25

5% of the population falls below this value. This represents the lower range of typical variation.

25th Percentile (P25)

348.75

25% of the population falls below this value. This represents the lower-middle range.

50th Percentile (Median)

450

This is the middle value. 50% of the population falls below and 50% falls above this value.

75th Percentile (P75)

551.25

75% of the population falls below this value. This represents the upper-middle range.

95th Percentile (P95)

696.75

95% of the population falls below this value. This represents the upper range of typical variation.

Mean (Average)

450

The arithmetic average of all values. This may differ from the median if the distribution is skewed.

Statistical Summary

Standard Deviation150
Distribution TypeNormal
PopulationAdult, All

Demographic Variations in Vitamin B12

Population-specific patterns in this metric reflect the complex interplay of genetics, environment, and health behaviors. All populations exhibit characteristic this metric distributions that differ from other groups due to genetic predisposition, dietary patterns, physical activity norms, and environmental factors. These differences are well-documented in health research and inform demographic-specific reference ranges. Within All All aged Adult, these patterns become more specific, reflecting the intersection of multiple demographic factors. Acknowledging these differences doesn't imply better or worse—just different normal ranges that enable more accurate assessment.

Factors Affecting Vitamin B12

this metric values reflect the combined influence of genetic factors, lifestyle choices, environmental conditions, and health status. While some determinants remain fixed, others respond to deliberate intervention. Understanding which factors influence this metric helps contextualize individual measurements and identify opportunities for positive change. Age-related changes, health conditions, and medications may also affect values over time.

Health Implications of Vitamin B12

this metric values contribute to overall health risk assessment when interpreted alongside other factors. Extreme values—particularly those below the 5th or above the 95th percentile—may indicate increased health risks depending on the specific metric and clinical context. However, being at an extreme doesn't automatically mean poor health; some individuals naturally fall at distribution tails. Risk assessment considers: absolute values, trends over time, family history, lifestyle factors, and co-existing health conditions. Within Blood Count, this metric contributes specific risk information that clinicians integrate with broader health assessment. Understanding your this metric as one piece of a larger health puzzle supports informed decision-making.

Clinical Significance

Healthcare providers interpret this metric within comprehensive clinical assessment. but clinical interpretation weighs individual values against patient history, symptoms, other measurements, and treatment goals. Within Blood Count assessment, this metric contributes specific diagnostic and monitoring value. Clinicians use this metric data for screening, diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and outcome assessment—always interpreted within individual clinical context.

Research Insights

Research on this metric has established robust population benchmarks that inform clinical practice and public health policy. The NHANES program, conducted continuously since the 1960s, provides among the most comprehensive this metric data available. This nationally representative survey combines standardized physical measurements with health interviews, enabling researchers to understand how this metric relates to health outcomes across diverse populations. NHANES data has informed countless research studies, clinical guidelines, and health policies.

Practical Applications

Applying this metric knowledge to real-world health decisions involves several practical considerations. First, obtain accurate measurements under appropriate conditions. Second, compare your values to demographic-matched benchmarks. Third, consider trends over time rather than isolated values. Fourth, discuss findings with healthcare providers who can integrate this metric with your complete health picture. Fifth, if warranted, take evidence-based actions to optimize your this metric through lifestyle modifications or medical interventions.

🇪🇸 Datos de Salud Regionales: España

Datos verificados de fuentes oficiales

Los datos españoles provienen de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud (ENSE) 2017, realizada por el Ministerio de Sanidad y el INE con más de 23.000 participantes.

El Sistema Nacional de Salud español ofrece cobertura universal gratuita con énfasis en atención primaria y medicina preventiva.

Datos oficiales de Ministerio de Sanidad ↗

Nota: Los datos principales son de CDC NHANES (EE.UU.). Las estadísticas locales son de encuestas nacionales oficiales. (2024-01)

📊Data Transparency & Sources

Sources & References

Source Citation

Source:CDC NHANES 2017-2020
Year:2020-2024
Population:Adult All (All)
Evidence Level:Level 1 (nationally representative survey)
View Original Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a normal this metric value?

Normal this metric encompasses a range of values that varies by demographic group. For individuals aged Adult, All, All population, the median value is 450. Values between the 5th and 95th percentiles (203.3 to 696.8) represent normal variation. Using demographic-matched benchmarks ensures appropriate comparison.

What's the significance of this metric percentiles?

Percentiles show where your this metric falls relative to others in your demographic group. At the 50th percentile (450), half the population is above and half below. Between the 25th (348.8) and 75th (551.3) percentiles represents the middle half of the distribution—where most healthy values fall. Percentiles at extreme ends (below 5th or above 95th) are less common but not necessarily abnormal. Context matters for interpretation.

Will my this metric stay the same throughout life?

this metric can change over time due to age-related processes, lifestyle modifications, health conditions, and interventions. Some factors are relatively fixed (like genetics), while others respond to deliberate changes (like exercise or diet). In the Adult age range, age-related changes may be occurring. Tracking your this metric over time reveals personal trends that provide valuable health information. Consistent measurement conditions enable meaningful comparison of values over time.

Should I worry about my this metric measurement?

Consider discussing your this metric with a healthcare provider if: values fall significantly outside normal range (below 5th or above 95th percentile), you've noticed substantial changes over time, values are associated with symptoms, or you have questions about health implications. Being at a percentile extreme doesn't automatically indicate problems—many healthy individuals naturally fall at distribution tails. Clinical significance depends on context, symptoms, and other health factors. Healthcare providers can offer personalized interpretation.

How does ethnicity affect this metric?

this metric values differ across ethnic groups due to genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. All populations show characteristic patterns that reflect population-specific genetics, dietary traditions, activity patterns, and environmental influences. These differences are normal and expected—not indicators of better or worse health. Using All-specific reference data ensures your comparison reflects meaningful variation rather than expected population differences. This demographic specificity improves the accuracy and relevance of health assessment.