Creatinine, 18-29, Male, All

Creatinine - Health metric data from CDC NHANES 2017-2020

Comprehensive Guide to Creatinine, 18-29, Male, All

Evidence-based health assessment relies on accurate population benchmarks. this metric measurements for Male aged 18-29 (All population) provide essential reference points backed by rigorous scientific methodology. With a median value of 1, the distribution reveals meaningful patterns about population health. This comprehensive analysis examines measurement protocols, statistical distributions, clinical significance, and practical implications for health monitoring.

What is Creatinine?

A measurement of this metric This health metric, measured in appropriate units, provides valuable information for health assessment and monitoring. Understanding what this metric represents and how it varies across populations helps individuals and healthcare providers make informed decisions.

How is Creatinine Measured?

The procedure for measuring this metric follows evidence-based protocols designed to maximize accuracy and reproducibility. NHANES measurements adhere to detailed procedural manuals that specify every aspect of the measurement process. From subject preparation to data recording, each step follows standardized procedures that minimize measurement error. Key procedural elements include: appropriate subject positioning, correct equipment use, consistent timing, and accurate recording. When these elements are standardized, this metric measurements provide reliable data for health assessment and comparison.

Distribution & Percentiles

The chart below shows how Creatinine is distributed across the population. The percentile values help you understand where you fall relative to others in your demographic group.

Insufficient data for visualization

This metric does not have enough statistical parameters for generating a visualization.

Understanding Percentile Distribution

The distribution of this metric values across the population follows a characteristic pattern that reveals important health insights. The central 90% of values fall between 0.7 (5th percentile) and 1.3 (95th percentile), defining the typical range for healthy individuals. At the center, the median value of 1 indicates that half the population falls above and half below this point. The interquartile range—0.9 to 1.1—encompasses the middle 50% of values, representing the most common range. Understanding where your measurement falls within this distribution provides meaningful context for health assessment.

Percentile Values Breakdown

5th Percentile (P5)

0.7

5% of the population falls below this value. This represents the lower range of typical variation.

25th Percentile (P25)

0.9

25% of the population falls below this value. This represents the lower-middle range.

50th Percentile (Median)

1

This is the middle value. 50% of the population falls below and 50% falls above this value.

75th Percentile (P75)

1.1

75% of the population falls below this value. This represents the upper-middle range.

95th Percentile (P95)

1.3

95% of the population falls below this value. This represents the upper range of typical variation.

Mean (Average)

1

The arithmetic average of all values. This may differ from the median if the distribution is skewed.

Statistical Summary

Standard Deviation0.2
Distribution TypeNormal
Population18-29, Male

Demographic Variations in Creatinine

Age significantly influences this metric through biological processes that vary across the lifespan. Young adults aged 18-29 typically demonstrate values reflecting peak physical development and physiological efficiency. For Male All individuals, age-specific benchmarks account for these developmental patterns. Age-appropriate reference data ensures accurate interpretation regardless of life stage.

Factors Affecting Creatinine

this metric emerges from the interplay of nature and nurture across the lifespan. Genetic factors establish physiological frameworks, while lifestyle choices, environmental conditions, and health status shape specific values. Age-related changes add another layer of influence. Recognizing this complexity helps interpret measurements accurately and identify realistic opportunities for health optimization.

Health Implications of Creatinine

Tracking this metric over time provides more valuable health information than single measurements. While individual values inform current status, trends reveal important patterns: stable values suggest consistent health status, while changing values may indicate developing conditions or successful interventions. Establishing your personal baseline—through repeated measurements under similar conditions—enables meaningful comparison over time. Regular monitoring, whether through clinical visits or personal tracking, supports early detection of meaningful changes and evaluation of health interventions.

Clinical Significance

From clinical perspective, this metric provides actionable health information when properly contextualized. In kidney function assessment, this metric helps clinicians evaluate current status, track changes, and guide interventions. but individual assessment considers the complete clinical picture. Discussion with healthcare providers enables personalized interpretation relevant to your specific health situation.

Research Insights

Research on this metric has established robust population benchmarks that inform clinical practice and public health policy. The NHANES program, conducted continuously since the 1960s, provides among the most comprehensive this metric data available. This nationally representative survey combines standardized physical measurements with health interviews, enabling researchers to understand how this metric relates to health outcomes across diverse populations. NHANES data has informed countless research studies, clinical guidelines, and health policies.

Practical Applications

Applying this metric knowledge to real-world health decisions involves several practical considerations. First, obtain accurate measurements under appropriate conditions. Second, compare your values to demographic-matched benchmarks. Third, consider trends over time rather than isolated values. Fourth, discuss findings with healthcare providers who can integrate this metric with your complete health picture. Fifth, if warranted, take evidence-based actions to optimize your this metric through lifestyle modifications or medical interventions.

🇰🇷 지역 건강 데이터: 대한민국

공식 출처에서 확인된 데이터

한국 데이터는 질병관리청이 매년 실시하는 국민건강영양조사(KNHANES)에 기반합니다. 이 조사는 전국적으로 약 10,000명을 대상으로 직접 측정을 실시합니다.

한국의 국민건강보험제도는 전 국민을 대상으로 하며, 국가건강검진 프로그램을 통해 정기적인 건강 모니터링을 제공합니다.

공식 데이터 질병관리청 ↗

참고: 주요 데이터는 CDC NHANES(미국)에서 가져온 것입니다. 지역 통계는 공식 국가 건강 조사에서 가져온 것입니다. (2024-01)

📊Data Transparency & Sources

Sources & References

Source Citation

Source:CDC NHANES 2017-2020
Year:2017-2020
Population:18-29 Male (All)
Evidence Level:Level 1 (nationally representative survey)
View Original Source →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is my this metric within normal limits?

Normal this metric encompasses a range of values that varies by demographic group. For individuals aged 18-29, Male, All population, the median value is 1. Values between the 5th and 95th percentiles (0.7 to 1.3) represent normal variation. Using demographic-matched benchmarks ensures appropriate comparison.

Where does my this metric rank compared to others?

Percentiles show where your this metric falls relative to others in your demographic group. At the 50th percentile (1), half the population is above and half below. Between the 25th (0.9) and 75th (1.1) percentiles represents the middle half of the distribution—where most healthy values fall. Percentiles at extreme ends (below 5th or above 95th) are less common but not necessarily abnormal. Context matters for interpretation.

What influences changes in this metric?

this metric can change over time due to age-related processes, lifestyle modifications, health conditions, and interventions. Some factors are relatively fixed (like genetics), while others respond to deliberate changes (like exercise or diet). In the 18-29 age range, age-related changes may be occurring. Tracking your this metric over time reveals personal trends that provide valuable health information. Consistent measurement conditions enable meaningful comparison of values over time.

What this metric values require medical attention?

Consider discussing your this metric with a healthcare provider if: values fall significantly outside normal range (below 5th or above 95th percentile), you've noticed substantial changes over time, values are associated with symptoms, or you have questions about health implications. Being at a percentile extreme doesn't automatically indicate problems—many healthy individuals naturally fall at distribution tails. Clinical significance depends on context, symptoms, and other health factors. Healthcare providers can offer personalized interpretation.

Why do this metric values differ across ethnic groups?

this metric values differ across ethnic groups due to genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. All populations show characteristic patterns that reflect population-specific genetics, dietary traditions, activity patterns, and environmental influences. These differences are normal and expected—not indicators of better or worse health. Using All-specific reference data ensures your comparison reflects meaningful variation rather than expected population differences. This demographic specificity improves the accuracy and relevance of health assessment.